Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't
>> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world.
> The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that
> send the text representation also. Would that be better?
It'd be more future-proof than this patch, but I'm still unconvinced
about the use-case.
regards, tom lane
