Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Date
Msg-id 23028.1075937898@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> Put it into the macro that checks for query cancel.

> Are there other places that you know offhand that we should check for
> signals?

I'd like to think that that is the only place.  There are places in the
code where we need to insert more cancel checks (I think the planner is
missing a few for instance) but there is not any justification for
cluttering things with a Windows-specific addition.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Next
From: Claudio Natoli
Date:
Subject: Win32 regression tests