Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date
Msg-id 22900.1220963044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication  ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes. We should have a LogwrtRqst pointer and LogwrtResult pointer for
>> the send operation. The Write and Send operations can then continue
>> independently of one another. XLogInsert() cannot advance to a new page
>> while we are waiting to send or write.

> Agreed.

"Agreed"?  That last restriction is a deal-breaker.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication