Re: New gist vacuum. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: New gist vacuum.
Date
Msg-id 22886B66-5391-460E-992C-C710DCFE136E@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New gist vacuum.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> 2 марта 2018 г., в 21:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> написал(а):
>
> Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
>> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch.
>
> Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments.
>
> I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in
> 2018-09 for the other patch.  I'd also suggest starting a new email
> thread for that.  Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't
> make it easy for people to find what's the current submission.

Thanks, Tom!

Yes, I'll definitely start new thread for that patch. This thread had split unexpectedly, and I see it's not a
convenientway. I've learned no to do it this way anymore :) 

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Rewrite of pg_dump TAP tests
Next
From: Julian Markwort
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)