Re: bytea vs. pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 22870.1249396885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If this seems reasonable, I can make a note of the point in the commit
>> message, so that we won't forget when the time comes.

> Or, what we could do is start an open items for 8.5 list similar to
> the one we made for 8.4.  That worked pretty well, I think.

OK.  Historically we haven't made such a list until beta starts, but
there's no reason we couldn't start it early.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause pg_proc.probin to be declared as text, not bytea.