Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6
Date
Msg-id 22821.1124636914@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> I am bit worried about those HAVE_IPV6 ifdefs - they will prolly have 
>> to be modified to C code under windows

> Now I consider it you might be right. Here's a list of those places:
> [lots]

You should not have to touch the HAVE_IPV6 code --- if you think you
do, you're misunderstanding the problem.  The IPV6 code was designed
to work even if the local kernel does not understand IPV6 (of course
you don't actually get any IPV6 connectivity, but nothing breaks).
It should be possible to handle Windows the same way.

> Can we even get this done for 8.1, or is it too late?

Considering that this is a new feature that we didn't have in 8.0,
anything more than a very localized tweak is not going to be accepted
for 8.1.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cascades Failing