Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Date
Msg-id 2272216.1650293635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I still think it would be better to have GetOldestSnapshot() be
> smarter and refuse to return the catalog snapshot. For one thing, that
> way we'd be testing for the problem case in non-assert builds also.

I was wondering about that too.  On the other hand, given that
we know this area is squishy, transforming fails-in-assert-builds
to fails-everywhere is not necessarily desirable.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_walcleaner - new tool to detect, archive and delete the unneeded wal files (was Re: pg_archivecleanup - add the ability to detect, archive and delete the unneeded wal files on the primary)