Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
Date
Msg-id 22674.1303140344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1  (Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> writes:
> On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am --- when I redid the GUC assign_hook logic a few weeks ago,
>> I changed the client_encoding code so that it shows the normalized
>> (official) name of the encoding, not whatever random string the client
>> sent over.  For instance, previous versions:

> Am I right in thinking that would be that change committed on the 7th
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2011-04/msg00039.php) ?

Yes, that one.

> What concerns me
> most is that (assuming my dates are right) the JDBC driver has been
> broken for 11 days and no one noticed. This would lead me to believe
> that there is no JDBC build server. What would it take to set one up?

+1 for doing something along that line.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1