Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:28 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> Uhhh, no, the point here was to assign bug numbers for emails to -bugs
>> which *don't* go through the bugs form and therefore didn't have the bug
>> number info in the message.
> Without having the ability to properly merge bugs and to structured cross
> referencing and such, I think that's a really bad idea. That's going to
> cause more problems than it's fixing.
Agreed. If we have bug numbers assigned to messages that aren't bugs,
or are replies to bugs, it's just going to be a mess.
regards, tom lane
