Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.
Date
Msg-id 22609.1519936758@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using acomposite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using acomposite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.
Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using acomposite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column.
List pgsql-bugs
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> At Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:13:51 +0300, Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote in <348951516742031@web54j.yandex.ru>
>> Should we also make backport to older versions? I test on REL_10_STABLE - patch builds and works ok, but "make
check"fails on new testcase with error: 
> CREATE INDEX ON t USING gist (a test_inet_ops, a inet_ops);
> + ERROR:  missing support function 4 for attribute 1 of index "t_a_a1_idx"
>> and with different explain results.

> Thank you for checking that. d3a4f89 allowed that and
> inet_gist_decompress is removed at the same time. Unfortunately I
> didn't find a type on master that has both decompress and fetch
> methods so I prefer to split the regression patch among target
> versions.

I pushed this fix with minor adjustments.  I did not like the proposed
regression test at all: it was overcomplicated and the need for different
versions for different back branches wasn't fun either.  After some poking
around I found that the bug could be exhibited using just btree_gist's
gist_inet_ops, since the core inet_ops class indexes the same datatype and
it does have a fetch function.  So I added a test case in btree_gist.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug