On 3/9/17 18:39, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> With the addition of transition tables we have all four, although
> I'm not sure whether the CREATE TRIGGER statement conforms closely
> enough to claim the feature. The two basic issues I can think of
> are:
> - we don't allow the OLD and NEW transition variable names to be
> specified -- using hard-coded values instead
> - we don't support the standard <triggered SQL statement> formats,
> instead supporting only our EXECUTE PROCEDURE syntax
>
> Do we leave T211, "Basic trigger capability" on our "unsupported"
> list until those two points are addressed?
Those seem pretty big ones.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
