Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date
Msg-id 2259481.1765831157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Experimenting here, it looks like 'C.UTF-8' might be accepted
> everywhere.  I even got it to pass on Solaris's not-GNU gettext,
> which I thought for sure would be the weak spot in the idea.
> I'll press forward with that.

Hmmm ... the first batch of BF reports show that on some Linux
machines, it works to set lc_messages to 'C.UTF-8', but nonetheless
no translation happens.  Did you notice any other gating factors?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add a callback data parameter to GetNamedDSMSegment
Next
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix severe performance regression with gettext 0.20+ on Windows