Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/8/19 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> I don't believe there is any consensus for integrating dblink into core,
>> and I for one will resist that strongly. Keep it in contrib.
> if integration means, so I could to write query like
> SELECT * FROM otherdatabase.schema.table ....
> UPDATE otherdb.table SET ...
> I am for integration.
That is not what "integrating dblink" means --- what Itagaki-san is
talking about is moving the dblink_xxx functions into core. What
you are talking about is actual SQL/MED functionality, which we should
indeed try to get into core someday. But dblink is a dead end as far
as standards compliance goes. Between that and the potential security
issues, we should not put it in core.
regards, tom lane
