<font default="FACE" face="Arial"><font default="SIZE" pointsize="10" size="2">Lamar,<br /><br /> See:<br /><br /><font
color="0000ff"><u><fontpointsize="9" size="1">http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q205/5/24.ASP<br /><font
color="000000"default="COLOR"></font></font></u><br /> IMO, its a bad idea to require the use of symlinks in order to
beable to put different tablespaces on different drives. For a discussion on how DB2 supports tablespaces see my
messageentitled:<br /> "tablespace managed by system vs managed by database"<br /><br /> I think one of the reasons one
needsa fairly complex syntax for creating table spaces is that different devices have different hardware
characteristicsand one might want to tell the RDBMS to treat them differently for that reason. You can see how DB2
allowsyou to do that if you read that message I posted about it. <font color="000000" default="COLOR"><font
default="SIZE"pointsize="10" size="2"><br /><br /> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:48:19 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:<br /><br />
>DoesWin32 do symlinks these days? I know Win32 does envvars, and Win32<br /> >is currently a supported
platform.<br/></font></font></font></font></font>
