Re: Database performance comparison paper. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Shelby Cain
Subject Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Date
Msg-id 224422.4393.qm@web55410.mail.re4.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Database performance comparison paper.  (Marc Evans <Marc@SoftwareHackery.Com>)
Responses Re: Database performance comparison paper.  (Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>)
Re: Database performance comparison paper.  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Re: Database performance comparison paper.  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
Excerpt from the document:
===================================================
2.  What is compared here - "Apples and Oranges"
The setups are as standard as can be.  The only principle guiding the installation of all the software is simplicity.
Nooptimization, no tweaks, no editing of configuration files. 
===================================================

That doesn't sound like a very useful methodology for benchmarking.

Regards,

Shelby Cain

----- Original Message ----
From: Marc Evans <Marc@SoftwareHackery.Com>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:21:03 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Database performance comparison paper.

Some people may find this interesting reading.

     http://us.devloop.org.uk/

- Marc

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq






____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Recover anything from dropped database?
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.