Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> Here is my thinking, and considering that that would basically involve a
>>> forward-looking design decision right now, I would support dropping the
>>> cardinality() function from 8.4 (if people agree that this is in fact the
>>> design decision to make).
>>
>> At this point I'd support that too.
> +1
Since there were no objections, and there is no time left before beta1,
I'm going to go ahead and remove cardinality().
regards, tom lane
