On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sounds like a lot of work for core to maintain various version comparison schemes
>
> Well, the primary argument for avoiding version comparison semantics to
> begin with was exactly that we didn't want to mandate a particular
> version-numbering scheme. However, if we're going to decide that we
> have to have version comparisons, I think we should just bite the bullet
> and specify one version numbering scheme. More than one is going to add
> complexity, sow confusion, and not really buy anything.
Precisely my thinking.
Best,
David
