Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
Date
Msg-id 22193.1521088405@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Doesn't it make sense if we provide a buildtime-script that
> collects the function names and builds a .h file containing a
> function using the list?

Surely this is a fundamentally misguided approach.  How could it
handle extension GUCs?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: INOUT parameters in procedures