Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date
Msg-id 22114.1155743153@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Forcing current WAL file to be archived  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
List pgsql-patches
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> We want a single row output, with two columns, yes?
> Presumably:
>     xlogfilename    TEXT
>     offset        INTEGER

Sounds right to me.  int4 should be wide enough for practical xlog
segment sizes.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: selecting large result sets in psql using cursors