Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view?
Date
Msg-id 22043.1196527458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view?  ("christopher wood" <chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca>)
List pgsql-bugs
"christopher wood" <chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca> writes:
> 1. Should I not have received an e-mail of your reply, asking for an
> example?

Yup, in fact two of them: one copy direct and one via the mailing list.
You need to check into possible over-aggressive spam filtering at your
end.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "christopher wood"
Date:
Subject: Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3774: create table like including index doesn't update pg_constraints with primary key