Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension
Date
Msg-id 22032.1474587229@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I have just encountered an apparent bug in pg_upgrade (or possibly pg_dump).

Hmm, it sort of looks like pg_dump believes it should dump the range's
constructor function in binary-upgrade mode, while the backend is creating
the constructor function during CREATE TYPE anyway.  But if that's the
case, upgrade of user-defined range types would never have worked ...
seems like we should have noticed before now.

If that diagnosis is correct, we should either change pg_dump to not
dump that function, or change CREATE TYPE AS RANGE to not auto-create
the constructor functions in binary-upgrade mode.  The latter might be
more flexible in the long run.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Tracking wait event for latches
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade vs user created range type extension