On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't mind the idea of saying "our intention is to support new
> releases for about five years", or something equally squishy.
> But a list of dates in black and white does not look reasonable,
> especially not dates that are four or five years out for versions
> that have zero track record. We have no idea whatsoever what the
> future will bring.
I think that it would be useful to have the squish comment, but also a
list of versions that are definitely no longer supported, and when
support ceased.
Best,
David
