> So, the selectivity that a search for the most common value would
> have is a reasonable estimate for the selectivity of a search for any
> value. That's a bogus assumption in this case --- but it's hard to
> justify making any other assumption in general.
>
Other db's usually use the value count(*) / nunique for the light weight
statistics.
This makes the assumptoin that the distinct index values are evenly
distributed.
That is on average a correct assumption, whereas our assumption on average
overestimates the number of rows returned.
I am not sure we have a nunique info though.
Andreas
