WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ
Subject WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
Date
Msg-id 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C6010A5203@sdexcsrv1.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
> >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> size
> >> would hit the same problem.
> > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
>
> > else. Is this Ok for you ?
>
> This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
>
> Andreas
>
>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pedro J. Lobo"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX
Next
From: Andrew Martin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Problems with running v6.3 on DIGITAL UNIX