On 6/12/21 1:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 6/12/21 10:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wonder whether that is a workaround for the poll_query_until bug
>>> I proposed to fix at [1].
>> No, it's because I found it annoying and confusing that there was an
>> invisible result when last_archived_wal is null.
> OK. But it makes me itch a bit that this one wait-for-wal-to-be-
> processed query looks different from all the other ones.
>
>
I'm happy to bring the other two queries that look like this into line
with this one if you like.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
