Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date
Msg-id 21950.1554506792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
List pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 14:01, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I don't have any more comments.

> Great. Many thanks for having a look at this.  Going by [1], Julien
> also seems pretty happy, so I'm going to change this over to ready for
> committer.

Pushed with some hacking, mostly trying to improve the comments.
The only really substantive thing I changed was that you'd missed
teaching ExecSetTupleBound about descending through Append.
Now that we can have plans that are Limit-above-Append-above-Sort,
that's important.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table