Re: pg_ctl and port number detection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_ctl and port number detection
Date
Msg-id 21860.1292821838@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl and port number detection  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl and port number detection  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> I wonder if we should write the port number as the 4th line in
>> postmaster.pid and return in a few major releases and use that.  We
>> could fall back and use our existing code if there is no 4th line.

No.  If it goes in, it should go in as the third line.  The shmem key
data is private to the server --- we do not want external programs
assuming anything at all about the private part of postmaster.pid.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes