Re: fastgetattr & isNull - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: fastgetattr & isNull
Date
Msg-id 21698.1262801813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fastgetattr & isNull  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: fastgetattr & isNull  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: fastgetattr & isNull  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Spoke with Bruce on IM and we think the best option is to just remove
> the NULL tests.  Since it's been this way for 11 years, presumably
> nobody is trying to use it with a NULL fourth argument.

> Proposed patch attached.

There are a number of is-null checks in related code that ought to go
away too --- look at heap_getattr, nocachegetattr, etc.  Our principle
here ought to be that none of the field-fetching routines allow a null
pointer.

I wouldn't bother with those added comments.  They wouldn't have been
there if the code had always been like this.  If you feel a need to
have a comment, it should be more like "Before Postgres 8.5, the isnull
argument could be a null pointer, but we no longer allow that".  That
way tells people that there was a change here that might affect their
code, whereas the addition you suggest wouldn't flag that.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: fastgetattr & isNull
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: fastgetattr & isNull