Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> Though, I would suggest that if you really only care about the first 50
> results, then put a LIMIT 50 in your query! The query planner may come
> up with a better plan if you do that, too ..
>
> If you want to "stream" the whole resultset, then fetchsize is certainly
> the way to do it.
>
Yeah, I was actually settling on "LIMIT 50" before coming across
setFetchSize().
However, the support for LIMIT varies from one DBMS to another. To keep
the code as portable as possible, I decided to go with setFetchSize().
-----
--
Kent Tong
Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW
Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/experience-sharing%3A-select-query-returns-more-records-than-necessary-tp21556532p21564410.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
