Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Date
Msg-id 2151672.1755898435@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends  (Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> writes:
> One point I did not make earlier is that the tranche name lengths will
> need to be as long as we allow in dsm_registry.c.

> #define DSMR_NAME_LEN 128

Huh.  Why is that different from NAMEDATALEN in the first place?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: [18+] improve upgrade pre-check for Unicode updates