Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...
Date
Msg-id 21510.1039482930@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> At 03:54 PM 9/12/2002 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FSM entries aren't needed for sequences either, so more correct is
>> 
>> select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't');

> presumably:

>       select count(*) from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't', 'i');

No, I meant what I said.  Indexes don't use the FSM.  (The premise of
the FSM is that one bit of free space in a table is as good as any other
bit; a premise quite incorrect for indexes.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.3 Installation on SCO
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: DB Tuning Notes for comment...