Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)
Date
Msg-id 21500.1033747822@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: numeric hierarchy again (was Re: floor function in 7.3b2)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Do we know that defaulting floating constants will not be a performance
> hit?

Uh ... what's your concern exactly?  The datatype coercion (if any) will
happen once at parse time, not at runtime.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Return of INSTEAD rules
Next
From: "Michael Paesold"
Date:
Subject: Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP