Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 21472.1493091906@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-04-24 23:37:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I remember seeing those and those are normally details I do not put in
>> the release notes as there isn't a clear user experience change except
>> "Postgres is faster".  Yeah, a bummer, and I can change my filter, but
>> it would require discussion.

> I think "postgres is faster" is one of the bigger user demands, so I
> don't think that policy makes much sense.  A large number of the changes
> over the next few releases will focus solely on that.  Nor do I think
> past release notes particularly filtered such changes out.

I think it has been pretty common to accumulate a lot of such changes
into generic entries like, say, "speedups for hash joins".  More detail
than that simply isn't useful to end users; and as a rule, our release
notes are too long anyway.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes