On Ôåô 08 ÌáÀ 2013 08:28:31 Jim Mercer wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:03:30AM +0300, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> > Pretty informative Jim, thanx.
> >
> > Do you remember which version, when, by who, were these shortcomings
> > (different user, different port) resolved?
> > At the time it seemed like a very hard thing to implement in the current
> > status of jails.
> > So, to rephrase, did it take a major jail re-write to achieve the above?
> > or was it more on the hack-side?
>
> i didn't keep up with the release notes, but i think the first few rollouts
> of jails in FreeBSD were on the experimental side.
>
> it certainly took a few tweaks and hacks to make it robust.
>
> however, that was years ago.
>
> jails have evolved into a well thought out virtual kernel environment.
>
> ah, here you go, some stuff about setting up pgsql in a FreeBSD jail:
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=23114
Thanx,
1st the above links do not reveal anything new.
2nd, judging by the wiki : https://wiki.freebsd.org/Jails ,
jailified SysV IPC (or SysV IPC-ified jails) (the specific territory where pgsql comes in contact with jails)
are in stalled state.
Latest work i recall was for this docs.freevps.com/doku.php?id=freebsd:changelog project
and i remember that getting this through was something not easy to do.
That's why i asked about any milestones in FreeBSD jail implementation.
It just does not seem normal, all of a sudden for pgsql to work that nice in FreeBSD jails,
there have been also some rather "warm" discussions here in these very lists.
>
>
-
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
