Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items
Date
Msg-id 21376.964021519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of lar ge index items  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> While implementing multi-key btree-s for 6.1 I found problems with
> duplicates handling and this is why extra logic was added. But I never
> was happy with this logic -:)

Do you not like the proposal I was suggesting?  I thought it was pretty
much what you said yourself a few months ago...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: System tables since 7.0.0
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: btree split logic is fragile in the presence of large index items