Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Date
Msg-id 21286.1106087356@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Responses Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu>)
Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes:
> I almost think to not supply an MVCC system would break the "I" in ACID,
> would it not?

Certainly not; ACID was a recognized goal long before anyone thought of
MVCC.  You do need much more locking to make it work without MVCC,
though --- for instance, a reader that is interested in a just-modified
row has to block until the writer completes or rolls back.

People who hang around Postgres too long tend to think that MVCC is the
obviously correct way to do things, but much of the rest of the world
thinks differently ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Next
From: Reini Urban
Date:
Subject: Re: Some things I like to pick from the TODO list ...