Re: pg_ctl options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_ctl options
Date
Msg-id 2127.1168136875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl options  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Certainly postgres has plenty of long ones.  And I don't know why 

> I don't see them.

postgres/postmaster accept --any-guc-variable=value.  AFAIR all the
single-letter options these days are equivalent to one of those.
There's not anything else to do there, except perhaps fix the
documentation (I'm not clear on why Table 17-1 is where it is and
not on the postgres command reference page).

I can't get excited about inventing short options for pg_config.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances