Re: fsync vs fdatasync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: fsync vs fdatasync
Date
Msg-id 21267.992203491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to fsync vs fdatasync  (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> Wouldn't the replacement of fsync with fdatasync increase performance
> on all platforms which support the difference?

We already prefer fdatasync where available, in performance-critical
pathways.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: fsync vs fdatasync
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: New version of contrib-intarray