Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Date
Msg-id 21253.1297185024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Hm, no, that logic is the same as before no?

> Well I had

>         if (!control->relocatable && control->schema != NULL)

> And you have 

> +     else if (control->schema != NULL)

Yeah, I deleted that relocatable test because it's redundant:
control->schema cannot be set for a relocatable extension,
cf the test in read_extension_control_file.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types