Re: Casts question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Casts question
Date
Msg-id 21241.1087574998@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Casts question  (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>)
Responses Re: Casts question
List pgsql-hackers
Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz> writes:
> I have defined a datatype called "varcharci", shamelessly yanking the 
> input, output, recv and send functions from varchar. This means (as far 
> as I understand things) that this type is binary compatible with varchar.

Use text, not varchar.

> Why is that? Being as it is that no operator = is defined for varcharci, 
> and that the cast from varchar to varcharci is "as assignment" anyways, 
> shouldn't postgres be able to do the cast implicitly?

Yes, it can cast to varchar, but that doesn't help because there are no
varchar operators ;-).  To resolve the operator, it has to promote both
sides to text, and you didn't offer a cast to text.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using domains for case insensitivity
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: specifying multiple result format codes with libpq