Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From YUriy Zhuravlev
Subject Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date
Msg-id 2114858.AupMSLaA2Q@dinodell
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 22 October 2015 12:53:49 you wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev
> 
> <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full
> > plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task
> > parallel query does not have such a problem?
> 
> It's already fixed.  See commits
> a0d9f6e434bb56f7e5441b7988f3982feead33b3 and
> 9f1255ac859364a86264a67729dbd1a36dd63ff2.

Ahh. Thanks.

And then another question:
What do you think if the generated equalfuncs.c, copyfuncs.c, readfuncs.c, 
outfuncs.c from XML or JSON?
In order not to change the code in four places when changing nodes. 

-- 
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: make Gather node projection-capable