Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules
Date
Msg-id 2113273.1724378617@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> The patch does not apply on HEAD due to the dependency with the other
> things you are proposing, and I would have hardcoded failures to check
> that the reports are correct, but that looks neat on read.

I did test it by injecting errors, but I don't see why we'd leave
those in place?

Anyway, my thought was to merge this into the other patch series,
but I didn't do that yet.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum statistics
Next
From: "席冲(宜穆)"
Date:
Subject: slru bank