Re: potential bug in trigger with boolean params - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: potential bug in trigger with boolean params
Date
Msg-id 2106.1305137074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: potential bug in trigger with boolean params  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Is there a special reason for not using the normal function calling 
> mechanisms? It looks to me as it was just done to have an easy way to store it 
> in pg_trigger.tgargs.

Well, this is all very historical, dating from Berkeley days AFAIK.
If we had it to do over, I bet we'd do it differently --- but the pain
of changing it seems to exceed any likely benefit.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Standbys which don't synch to disk?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT