Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types
Date
Msg-id 20A114CA-0FC9-47B0-9E7A-2AB80325FFE4@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 31, 2008, at 10:42, David E. Wheeler wrote:

>> Good point --- so new members of STRING category aren't going to be
>> that
>> common, except for domains which apparently aren't bothering people
>> anyway.  I'll go ahead and make the change.  (I think it's just a
>> trivial change in find_coercion_pathway, and everything else should
>> Just Work.  If it turns out not to be trivial maybe we should
>> reconsider.)
>
> Wow. Really nice, Tom. Thanks!
>
> The attached patch has all the tests I added to my svn version
> against 8.3, and for which I had to write 60 additional cast
> functions.

Ping! Just wanted to make sure this wasn't lost in the shuffle…

Thanks,

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/PythonU