Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 20965.1035898649@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
>> Yeah.  AFAICS the only way around this is to avoid doing any I/O
>> operations in the flex-generated files.  Fortunately, that's not much
>> of a restriction.

> Unfortunately I do not think that is sufficient, since the problem is already
> at the #include level. The compiler barfs on the second #include <unistd.h>
> from postgres.h

AIX is too stupid to wrap unistd.h in an "#ifndef" to protect against
double inclusion?  I suppose we could do that for them...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for supported platforms