Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects
Date
Msg-id 20837.1060982257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects  (Kevin Houle <kjh@cert.org>)
Responses Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects  (Kevin Houle <kjh@cert.org>)
Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects  (Kevin Houle <kjh@cert.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
Kevin Houle <kjh@cert.org> writes:
> Is it just me, or are both sides reading waiting for the other
> side to send data?

Sure looks like it.  Could it be an OpenSSL bug?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects
Next
From: Kevin Houle
Date:
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg 'lo_read' fails on >= 32768 byte large objects