Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 6:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The error is coming from the planner's get_actual_variable_range:
>> and I think it's entirely within its rights to complain, because it
>> set up the scan key to reject nulls. In short, somebody seems to
>> have broken btrees' processing of SK_ISNULL | SK_SEARCHNOTNULL scankeys,
>> and they broke it in v11, because prior versions don't show this failure.
> It's not obvious to me why that might be. I'll run a "git bisect" to
> track down the offending commit.
I just finished doing that, and indeed it fingers 3ca930fc3 as the
first bad commit. Seems like it must have exposed a pre-existing
problem though? Too tired to look further tonight.
regards, tom lane
