Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
Date
Msg-id 20817.1285951794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 17:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW, I've noticed that "git push" will reject an attempt to push an
>> update in one branch if my other branches are not up to date, even
>> if I am not trying to push anything for those branches. �That's
>> pretty annoying too; is there a way around that?

> I admit I haven't tried it, but won't that get fixed if you push just
> the current branch? E.g. "git push origin master"?

I'll try that next time; I haven't gotten further than using git push's
default behavior.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: So git pull is shorthand for what exactly?