Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 14:19:30 -0400 2010:
>> What seems more rational is to provide toast.fillfactor but give it
>> min/max/default = 100.
> Adding an entry to intRelOpts should be enough to fix this bug, correct?
I think so, but haven't tested. The docs would need some correction
perhaps.
BTW, I notice that the code allows people to fool with
autovacuum_analyze_threshold and related parameters for toast tables,
which seems rather pointless since we never analyze toast tables.
So the fillfactor isn't really the only instance of the issue.
Maybe a better solution is to have some kind of notion of a default-only
entry, which is sufficient to insert the default into the struct but
isn't accepted as a user-settable item.
regards, tom lane
