Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Date
Msg-id 20764.1354667748@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
List pgsql-bugs
I wrote:
> So apparently this is something we broke since Nov 18.  Don't know what
> yet --- any thoughts?

Further experimentation shows that reverting commit
ffc3172e4e3caee0327a7e4126b5e7a3c8a1c8cf makes it work.  So there's
something wrong/incomplete about that fix.

This is a bit urgent since we now have to consider whether to withdraw
9.2.2 and issue a hasty 9.2.3.  Do we have a regression here since
9.2.1, and if so how bad is it?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Next
From: elein@varlena.com
Date:
Subject: BUG #7730: intarray representation of empty arrays